Argumentum anti-normannicum, or, An argument proving, from ancient histories and records, that William, Duke of Normandy, made no absolute conquest of England by the Sword, in the sense of our modern writers being an answer to these four questions, viz. I. Whether William the First made an absolute conquest of this nation at his first entrance?, II. Whether he cancelled and abolished all the confessor's laws?, III. Whether he divided all our estates and fortunes between himself and his nobles?, IV. Whether it be not a grand error to affirm, that there were no English-men in the Common Council of the whole Kingdom?

Atwood, William, d. 1705?

Please use the following text to cite this item or export to a predefined format:

Atwood, William, d. 1705?; Johnson, Samuel, 1649-1703.; Coke, Edward, Sir, 1552-1634.; Petyt, William, 1636-1707. and Cooke, Edward, of the Middle Temple., 2003, Argumentum anti-normannicum, or, An argument proving, from ancient histories and records, that William, Duke of Normandy, made no absolute conquest of England by the Sword, in the sense of our modern writers being an answer to these four questions, viz. I. Whether William the First made an absolute conquest of this nation at his first entrance?, II. Whether he cancelled and abolished all the confessor's laws?, III. Whether he divided all our estates and fortunes between himself and his nobles?, IV. Whether it be not a grand error to affirm, that there were no English-men in the Common Council of the whole Kingdom?, CLARIN DSpace, http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14106/A33624.

Share

dc.contributor	Text Creation Partnership,
dc.contributor.author	Atwood, William, d. 1705?
dc.contributor.author	Johnson, Samuel, 1649-1703.
dc.contributor.author	Coke, Edward, Sir, 1552-1634.
dc.contributor.author	Petyt, William, 1636-1707.
dc.contributor.author	Cooke, Edward, of the Middle Temple.
dc.coverage.placeName	London
dc.date.accessioned	2018-05-25
dc.date.accessioned	2022-08-25T06:20:49Z
dc.date.available	2022-08-25T06:20:49Z
dc.date.created	1682
dc.date.issued	2003-01
dc.description.abstract	"This publication, occasioned by a work of William Pettyt's, entitled Antient rights of the commons of England, 1680, was answered by Brady in his Introduction to old English history. It is by some attributed to Atwood, and by others to Cooke or Johnson." cf. Lowndes. Has also been attributed to Petyt and to Sir Edward Coke. Identified on UMI microfilm and reel guide as C4907 (entry cancelled in Wing 2nd ed.). Reproduction of original in Cambridge University Library.
dc.format.extent	Approx. 217 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 92 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images.
dc.format.medium	Digital bitstream
dc.format.mimetype	text/xml
dc.identifier	ota:A33624
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14106/A33624
dc.language	English
dc.language.iso	eng
dc.publisher	University of Oxford
dc.relation.isformatof	https://data.historicaltexts.jisc.ac.uk/view?pubId=eebo-ocm12129437e
dc.relation.ispartof	EEBO-TCP
dc.rights	This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.
dc.rights.label	PUB
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
dc.subject.lcsh	William -- I, -- King of England, 1027 or 8-1087.
dc.subject.lcsh	Great Britain -- History -- William I, 1066-1087.
dc.title	Argumentum anti-normannicum, or, An argument proving, from ancient histories and records, that William, Duke of Normandy, made no absolute conquest of England by the Sword, in the sense of our modern writers being an answer to these four questions, viz. I. Whether William the First made an absolute conquest of this nation at his first entrance?, II. Whether he cancelled and abolished all the confessor's laws?, III. Whether he divided all our estates and fortunes between himself and his nobles?, IV. Whether it be not a grand error to affirm, that there were no English-men in the Common Council of the whole Kingdom?
dc.type	Text
local.branding	Oxford Text Archive
local.files.count	4
local.files.size	2795957
local.has.files	yes
local.identifier.stc	Wing C4907
local.identifier.stc	ESTC R1971
local.language.name	English
otaterms.date.range	1600-1699

Collections

EEBO - Early English Books Online

This item isPublicly Available

and licensed under:

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.

Files in this item

This item contains no files.

Show simple item record