Several arguments, proving, that inoculating the small pox is not contained in the law of physick, either natural or Divine, and therefore unlawful. Together with a reply to two short pieces, one by the Rev. Dr. Increase Mather, and another by an anonymous author, intituled, Sentiments on the small pox inoculated. : And also, a short answer to a late letter in the New-England courant. / By John Williams.

Williams, John, 1664-1729.

Please use the following text to cite this item or export to a predefined format:

Williams, John, 1664-1729., 2008, Several arguments, proving, that inoculating the small pox is not contained in the law of physick, either natural or Divine, and therefore unlawful. Together with a reply to two short pieces, one by the Rev. Dr. Increase Mather, and another by an anonymous author, intituled, Sentiments on the small pox inoculated. : And also, a short answer to a late letter in the New-England courant. / By John Williams., CLARIN DSpace, http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14106/N29903.

Share

dc.contributor	Text Creation Partnership,
dc.contributor.author	Williams, John, 1664-1729.
dc.coverage.placeName	Boston, Massachusetts
dc.date.accessioned	2018-05-25
dc.date.accessioned	2022-08-22T22:29:51Z
dc.date.available	2022-08-22T22:29:51Z
dc.date.created	1721
dc.date.issued	2008-09
dc.description.abstract	(Evans-TCP no. N29903) Transcribed from: (Readex Archive of Americana Early American Imprints, series I image set 39757) Images scanned from Readex microprint and microform: (Early American imprints. First series no. 39757)
dc.format.extent	Approx. 46 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 23 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images.
dc.format.medium	Digital bitstream
dc.format.mimetype	text/xml
dc.identifier	ota:N29903
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14106/N29903
dc.language	English
dc.language.iso	eng
dc.publisher	University of Oxford
dc.relation.ispartof	Evans-TCP
dc.rights	This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Evans Early American Imprints Text Creation Partnership (Evans-TCP). This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.
dc.rights.label	PUB
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
dc.subject.lcsh	Mather, Cotton, 1663-1728. -- Sentiments on the small pox inoculated.
dc.subject.lcsh	Mather, Increase, 1639-1723. -- Several reasons proving that inoculating or transplanting the small pox, is a lawful practice.
dc.subject.lcsh	Smallpox -- Vaccination
dc.title	Several arguments, proving, that inoculating the small pox is not contained in the law of physick, either natural or Divine, and therefore unlawful. Together with a reply to two short pieces, one by the Rev. Dr. Increase Mather, and another by an anonymous author, intituled, Sentiments on the small pox inoculated. : And also, a short answer to a late letter in the New-England courant. / By John Williams.
dc.type	Text
local.branding	Oxford Text Archive
local.files.count	3
local.files.size	148917
local.has.files	yes
local.identifier.stc	Shipton 39757
local.language.name	English
otaterms.date.range	1700-1799

Collections

Evans Early American Imprints

This item isPublicly Available

and licensed under:

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Evans Early American Imprints Text Creation Partnership (Evans-TCP). This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.

Files in this item

This item contains no files.

Show simple item record