Please use the following text to cite this item or export to a predefined format:
Parsons, Robert, 1546-1610, attributed name., 2009, Severall speeches delivered at a conference concerning the power of Parliament, to proeeed [sic] against their King for misgovernment. In which is stated: I. That government by blood is not by law of nature, or divine, but only by humane and positive laws of every particular common-wealth, and may upon just causes be altered. II. The particular forme of monarchies and kingdomes, and the different laws whereby they are to be obtained, holden and governed ... III. The great reverence and respect due to kings, ... IV. The lawfulnesse of proceeding against princes: ... V. The coronation of princes, ... VI. What is due to onely succession by birth, and what interest or right an heire apparent hath to the crown, ... VII. How the next in succession by propinquity of blood, have often times been put back by the common-wealth, ... VIII. Divers other examples out of the states of France and England, for proofe that the next in blood are sometimes put back from succession, ... IX. What are the principall points which a common-wealth ought to respect in admitting or excluding their king, wherein is handled largely also of the diversity of religions, and other such causes., CLARIN DSpace, http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14106/A91487.
dc.contributorText Creation Partnership,
dc.contributor.authorParsons, Robert, 1546-1610, attributed name.
dc.coverage.placeNameLondon
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-25
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-25T21:27:51Z
dc.date.available2022-08-25T21:27:51Z
dc.date.created1648
dc.date.issued2009-03
dc.description.abstractBy William Allen, Sir Francis Englefield, and others. "Robert Persons [Parsons], who is often credited with sole authorship of the work, probably played only a small part in its composition or revision"--Halkett & Laing (3rd ed.). "A republication of the first part of the Conference about the next succession to the crown of England, written by R. Parsons, under the name of Dolman."--BM Catalogue. Annotation on Thomason copy: "Doleman" the final 'I' in the imprint has been crossed out, and replaced with a "7" "ffebr. 3". Reproduction of the original in the British Library.
dc.format.extentApprox. 329 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 41 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images.
dc.format.mediumDigital bitstream
dc.format.mimetypetext/xml
dc.identifierota:A91487
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14106/A91487
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversity of Oxford
dc.relation.isformatofhttps://data.historicaltexts.jisc.ac.uk/view?pubId=eebo-99863214e
dc.relation.ispartofEEBO-TCP
dc.rightsThis keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.
dc.rights.labelPUB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
dc.subject.lcshGreat Britain -- Kings and rulers -- Succession -- Early works to 1800.
dc.subject.lcshGreat Britain -- History -- Civil War, 1642-1649 -- Early works to 1800.
dc.titleSeverall speeches delivered at a conference concerning the power of Parliament, to proeeed [sic] against their King for misgovernment. In which is stated: I. That government by blood is not by law of nature, or divine, but only by humane and positive laws of every particular common-wealth, and may upon just causes be altered. II. The particular forme of monarchies and kingdomes, and the different laws whereby they are to be obtained, holden and governed ... III. The great reverence and respect due to kings, ... IV. The lawfulnesse of proceeding against princes: ... V. The coronation of princes, ... VI. What is due to onely succession by birth, and what interest or right an heire apparent hath to the crown, ... VII. How the next in succession by propinquity of blood, have often times been put back by the common-wealth, ... VIII. Divers other examples out of the states of France and England, for proofe that the next in blood are sometimes put back from succession, ... IX. What are the principall points which a common-wealth ought to respect in admitting or excluding their king, wherein is handled largely also of the diversity of religions, and other such causes.
dc.typeText
local.brandingOxford Text Archive
local.files.count4
local.files.size4790493
local.has.filesyes
local.identifier.stcWing P573
local.identifier.stcThomason E521_1
local.identifier.stcESTC R203152
local.language.nameEnglish
otaterms.date.range1600-1699